What Role Will Hughes Have if He Does Not Depart?

With the end of the transfer window fast approaching, Will Hughes and Watford do not have much time to strike a deal with another Club to offload the Englishman. The Sun reported Crystal Palace offered Watford a laughable £5 million for Hughes to effectively see if the Hornets would cheaply offload his services. The offer falls £7 million short of what Watford are looking for, so the Hughes transfer saga continues.

The Current Hughes Situation

Upon promotion to the Premier League, it seemed a sure-fire bet that Hughes would extend his Watford contract which expires at the end of this current campaign. What more could Hughes want? He was a key player and potential future captain at the Club, adored by the fans, and offered a considerable rise in pay (as per Adam Leventhal of The Athletic). He and his agent decided to search for alternative options, with Crystal Palace being his main suitor.

Such is a puzzling decision to not extend his time at Watford when the alternative is a team of Crystal Palace’s stature, especially considering Hughes was one of the few players whose role in the starting eleven post-promotion was not (previously) under threat. Even though Crystal Palace are undeniably more established in the top flight than Watford in recent years, a move to Selhurst Park is not a considerable step up for a player such as Hughes. Both are teams whose main goal is to avoid the drop, and at Vicarage Road, he already has a strong history and the perfect platform to continue his progression as a player into a more defensive-minded midfield role. 

While the transfer window rolled on and offers for Hughes did not arrive, he was iced out of first-team training. Even though such treatment might be harsh, it is imperative Xisco Munoz has players who are 100% focused on what is going on in Hertfordshire. Thus, Hughes has been spending time with the U23s while waiting for a transfer to be accepted.

Starting Spot Likely Already Lost

Once Hughes rejected the new contract, the Hornets operated under the assumption they would need to find a replacement for him on top of their quest to bolster their midfield into a Premier-League-quality unit. Peter Etebo has performed admirably in the number six role between preseason and the opening-day victory against Aston Villa. Juraj Kucka and Imran Louza have also arrived to play as starters. A deal for Fenerbahce’s highly-rated Ozan Tufan has also just been completed (rumour initially reported on Watford Opinionsconfirmation of the deal by the Club was made Thursday morning). Tufan, who garnered interest from a handful of other Premier League clubs, is destined to play a huge role for the Hornets this season. 

Between the Hornets’ four new midfield signings, room for Hughes in the starting eleven, even if an agreement to stay at Watford is completed against all expectations, is far from a guarantee. 

The Price Offered (So Far) for Departure Is Not Right

As previously mentioned, Crystal Palace offered a “take it or leave it” bid of £5 million for Hughes. Even though the Hornets risk losing him for no profit at the end of the season, the hierarchy knows allowing relegation rivals to strengthen their squad without Watford receiving due compensation to likewise improve is even more costly. 

If Crystal Palace or another club offers the ideal £12 million or a sum close to it, then a Hughes departure should be warranted and the profits to be used for significantly strengthening other positions to boost survival chances (though the midfield does not need any more reinvestment following the arrival of Tufan). 

The Role Hughes Has if He Stays

Simply stated, his role should either be limited or non-existent. If he makes the 25-man roster, then he can still be used as a somewhat effective rotation player, even if the minutes are few and far between due to the form of the new starters and the time he will need to be reintegrated into Xisco’s tactics. 

However, the Hornets do not have any room to waste when naming their 25-man squad, so there is a decent chance Hughes misses out on the roster altogether. In that case, he will have to train with the U23s or away from the Club, not able to play for Watford or anyone else until the beginning of 2022.

The next 12 days will have to be decisive in this transfer saga. It is safe to say what Hughes and his agent envisioned would pan out did not. Now, he runs the risk of losing playing time and suitors for the foreseeable future, with long-term side effects from not playing first-team football a potential issue as well.

One thought on “What Role Will Hughes Have if He Does Not Depart?

  1. Fantastic article and the best I’ve read on the Hughes situation. I agree that now it’s hard to see a place for him at all and Chalobah more than likely finds himself in the exact same situation. At this level both club and manager are not going to want a player(s) in the squad who have made it crystal clear don’t want to be there. At this point I’m not sure whether they stay or go has any direct bearing on the squad at all. Kucka, Etebo and Tufan are all seasoned internationals and Louza is above both players in terms of quality anyway. Should either player stay I can’t see one or both being any more than bench/injury cover and in this regard again given both want away I just can’t see the club wanting them around the squad. I can’t help but wonder given how early Louza was signed that Chalobah in particular realized he wasn’t going to see a starting position again? While I personally never played this high a level I did play a level and there is very little, if anything, happens in a competitive club the first team squad are not aware of. New players don’t just ‘arrive’ out of the blue there is a lot of planning and a lot of discussions within the club before players are brought in and likewise players shown the door out. If both players are frozen out ( with Hughes I actually think Watford may well decide to sell at a discount and cut their losses and lose his wage bill) which I strongly suspect they will be, by my calculations that leaves the midfield with one midfielder short. Kucka is 34 and unlikely to play more than two thirds of games as he did with Parma so that only leaves Louza, Tufan, Etebo and Cleverley as fulltime midfield options for the three starting spots which is thin at this level. Gosling is bench/injury cover. I would therefore not be surprised to see another midfielder brought in even at this late stage of the window. Both Hughes and Chalobah especially last season both put shifts in for the club and the team which led to promotion and I both respect and appreciate that but this is not good business from either of them and could well impact negatively on their careers as you have rightly pointed out. Silly lads this could have been handled a whole lot differently. I wish them all the best in whatever lies ahead for them.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: